737 Max Sensor Redundancy

737 Max Sensor Redundancy. Like all commercial aircraft, the boeing 737 max has multiple levels of redundancy for its important systems. Why doesn’t boeing add redundant attitude sensors to its 737 max design?

New 737 MAX Flaw Discovered as Boeing Aims for from www.engineering.com

Concerns expressed over 737 max redundancy, manual trim. However, mcas only takes input from 1 aoa sensor at a time. Again, there is a claim that boeing could correct for a.

Source: aviationweek.com

Again, there is a claim that boeing could correct for a. Boeing’s optional safety features, in part, could have helped the pilots detect any erroneous readings.

Source: europe.infowars.com

Such is the case with some of boeing’s angle of attack vanes, the sensors thought to be responsible for two 2019 crashes involving the 787 max. “doomed boeing jets lacked 2 safety features that company sold only as extras” (nytimes):

Source: aviationforaviators.com

The boeing 737 max has 2 aoa sensors. The pilots had been unable to override mcas… they didn’t even learn about it.

Source: www.60degree.com

Such is the case with some of boeing’s angle of attack vanes, the sensors thought to be responsible for two 2019 crashes involving the 787 max. Mcas should have never relied on a single sensor, and.

Source: www.engineering.com

Concerns expressed over 737 max redundancy, manual trim. Internal pressure to keep pace with.

Source: airwaysmag.com

Sometimes aerospace sensors don’t do exactly what they should. Why doesn’t boeing add redundant attitude sensors to its 737 max design?

Internal Pressure To Keep Pace With.

Because the best way to make a safe passenger aircraft is to make it inherently aerodynamically stable. Mcas should have never relied on a single sensor, and. The planes crashed because the sensor failed, and the software forced the plane down.

Aoa Malfunction Is The Root Stimulus That Triggered The Events That Unfolded On Lion Air Jt610 And Ethiopian Et302.

The software fix is to ignore the sensor if it fails, but why not use redundant sensors? Explanations for the crashes include: The 737 max’s mcas is unusual in that it receives input from only one aoa sensor, rather than two (which is common on other aircraft).

One Of The Optional Upgrades, The Angle Of Attack Indicator, Displays The Readings Of The.

Concerns expressed over 737 max redundancy, manual trim. Boeing engineers considered that lack of redundancy acceptable, according to proprietary information reviewed by the seattle times,. Boeing could add new sensors to give the angle of attack vanes more redundancy, but they believe they have a workaround that is equally.

The Pilots Had Been Unable To Override Mcas… They Didn’t Even Learn About It.

Modern aviation is known for its redundancy. The challenge is to decrease the likelihood of undetected malfunction while. Input from two sensors provides redundancy and the ability for sensors to crosscheck each other’s values.

Boeing Has Admitted That The Recent Two Crashes Involving Their 737 Max Aircraft Model Was Due To A Problem With The Software Running On The Aircraft.

The software fix is to ignore the sensor if it fails, but why not use redundant sensors? The pilots were unable to override mcas… they didn’t even know about it. The planes crashed because the sensor failed, and the software forced the plane down.